Low-Carb Beats Low-Fat for Weight Loss, Heart Health: Study


By Amy Norton

HealthDay Reporter


MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — For people who want to lose weight and boost their heart health, cutting down on carbohydrates may work better than trimming dietary fat, a new study suggests.


In a small clinical trial of obese adults, researchers found that those assigned to follow a low-carbohydrate diet lost more weight over a year than those who followed a low-fat plan.


They also had bigger improvements in their cholesterol and triglyceride levels, the research team reports in the Sept. 2 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.


“On average, they lost 8 pounds more, and lost more body fat mass,” said researcher Dr. Tian Hu, a doctoral fellow at Tulane University School of Public Health in New Orleans.


And while some experts have raised concerns that low-carbohydrate diets could be less than heart-healthy, these findings suggest otherwise, said Dr. Lydia Bazzano, who also worked on the study.


“Low-carb diets have traditionally been seen as potentially risky,” said Bazzano, a professor of nutrition research at Tulane.


Yet in this study, people on the low-carb diet saw slightly greater improvements in their levels of “good” HDL cholesterol and triglycerides — another type of blood fat. That could have been due to the bigger weight loss, Hu said, or to the greater amounts of “good” unsaturated fat in their diets.


But he also noted that the study ran for just one year, and it’s not clear how people on either diet would fare in the long run.


There are other caveats, too, according to a dietitian who was not involved in the study.


For one, people on the low-carbohydrate diet didn’t stick to it all that well. The regimen called for no more than 40 grams of carbohydrates a day — the equivalent of about two slices of bread. But, by the end of the year, people in the low-carbohydrate group were averaging 127 grams of carbohydrates a day, noted Sonya Angelone, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.


“I do think that most people eat too many carbohydrates,” she said. So eating fewer carbohydrates, and choosing high-quality ones — fruits, vegetables, beans and whole grains — is a sound idea, according to Angelone.


But one of the concerns with a low-carbohydrate diet, she said, is that people will not get enough fiber. A high-fiber diet can help ward off heart disease, and studies suggest it can aid weight loss by making people feel more full.


So instead of lowering carbohydrates “too much,” Angelone said, why not replace refined carbs — like white bread and pasta — with fiber-rich foods?


The current study included 148 adults who were obese but free of diabetes and heart problems. About half were randomly assigned to a low-carbohydrate diet, while the rest were placed on a low-fat plan.


People in both groups had counseling sessions with a dietitian: The low-fat group was told to get no more than 30 percent of their daily calories from fat, while the low-carbohydrate group was given a limit of 40 grams of carbohydrates per day. At the end of one year, the low-fat group averaged nearly 200 grams of carbohydrate daily compared to about 130 for the low-carb group, according to the study.


In the end, 82 percent of the low-fat group stuck with the diet for a full year. The same was true for 79 percent of the low-carbohydrate group.


By the one-year mark, people in the low-carbohydrate group had lost an average of almost 12 pounds. That compared with only four pounds for the low-fat group.


According to Hu, the findings do not mean low-carb is the “best” diet for weight loss. But, he said, “I think this means it’s a good option.”


Bazzano acknowledged, though, that many of the study participants didn’t strictly follow their prescribed low-carbohydrate plan. “It was more moderate than that,” she said. And she agreed that being “careful” about the amount and type of carbohydrates you eat is key — as opposed to setting a rigid carbohydrate limit.


Angelone also pointed to another issue with the study: Sedentary study participants were discouraged from taking up exercise, to isolate the effects of the diet changes. But in real life, people would ideally change their diets and exercise.


“Muscles use carbohydrates as fuel,” Angelone said. “It can be hard to exercise on a low-carb diet.” Plus, she added, people on the low-fat diet, who were eating more carbohydrates, might have shed more weight if they’d been exercising.


Everyone agreed that there is no one-size-fits-all diet. When it comes to heart health, for example, there is strong evidence that the Mediterranean diet — high in “good” carbohydrates and heart-healthy fats like olive oil — is a smart option.


Ultimately, people need to make diet changes they can keep up for the long haul — not just until they lose a certain amount of weight. The pounds will come back if you go back to your old ways, Angelone said.


More information


The U.S. National Institutes of Health has more on weight loss and nutrition.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1uo7vyg

Action-Packed TV a Threat to Your Waistline?



MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — Watching action shows on TV may be bad for your waistline, a new study contends.


People eat much more snack food while watching action films and programs than something less exciting, according to the Cornell University researchers.


“We find that if you’re watching an action movie while snacking your mouth will see more action too,” study author Aner Tal, of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab, said in a university news release. “In other words, the more distracting the program is, the more you will eat.”


The study included 94 undergraduate students who were provided with M&Ms, cookies, carrots and grapes while they watched 20 minutes of television. One-third of the participants watched a segment of the action movie “The Island” while another third watched the Charlie Rose show, and the final third watched the same segment of “The Island” without sound.


“People who were watching ‘The Island’ ate almost twice as many snacks — 98 percent more than those watching the talk show,” study co-author Brian Wansink, director of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab, said in the news release.


“Even those watching ‘The Island’ without sound ate 36 percent more,” he added.


Participants who watched the action movie also consumed more calories — 354 calories with sound and 314 without sound — than those who watched the interviewer Charlie Rose (215 calories).


“More stimulating programs that are fast-paced, include many camera cuts, really draw you in and distract you from what you are eating. They can make you eat more because you’re paying less attention to how much you are putting in your mouth,” Tal said.


Before you watch an action movie, you should prepare limited portions of snacks instead of grabbing a whole bag of chips or box of cookies, the researchers suggested. Even better, stick to healthy snacks such as carrots.


“The good news is that action movie watchers also eat more healthy foods, if that’s what’s in front of them. Take advantage of this,” Wansink said.


The study was published Sept. 1 in the journal JAMA: Internal Medicine.


More information


The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention outlines how to prevent weight gain.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1w170LN

Family Meals May Defuse Cyberbullying’s Impact, Study Says


MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — Having regular family meals may help protect teens from the harmful mental health effects of “cyberbullying,” a new study suggests.


Online abuse can lead to depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts, according to experts.


“One in five adolescents experience cyberbullying,” Frank Elgar, a professor at the Institute for Health and Social Policy at McGill University in Montreal, said in a university news release.


“Many adolescents use social media, and online harassment and abuse are difficult for parents and educators to monitor, so it is critical to identify protective factors for youths who are exposed to cyberbullying,” said Elgar, who is also a researcher at the Douglas Mental Health Institute.


He and his colleagues examined how family meals — which provide social contact and support — might help reduce the mental health impact that cyberbullying can have on teens.


The study included more than 20,000 adolescents in Wisconsin who were asked about their experiences with face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying, and mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse, self-harm, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts.


“We found that emotional, behavioral, and substance use problems are 2.6 to 4.5 times more common among victims of cyberbullying. And these impacts are not due to face-to-face bullying; they are specific to cyberbullying,” Elgar said.


The link between cyberbullying and these problems was more common among teens who ate fewer meals with their families. The findings suggest that regular family contact and communication may help protect teens against some of the harmful mental health effects of cyberbullying, according to the researchers.


“The results are promising, but we do not want to oversimplify what we observed. Many adolescents do not have regular family meals but receive support in other ways, like shared breakfasts, or the morning school run,” Elgar said.


The study was published online Sept. 1 in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.


Elgar also emphasized that parental involvement and supervision can help protect youngsters from cyberbullying.


“Checking in with teens about their online lives may give them tools to manage online harassment or bullying that can easily go undetected,” he said.


More information


The American Academy of Pediatrics has more about cyberbullying.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1w170LJ

Quality of U.S. Diet Improves, Slightly


MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — The quality of Americans’ diets has improved somewhat but remains poor overall, and dietary disparity between the rich and poor is growing, a new study shows.


“The study provides the most direct evidence to date that the extensive efforts by many groups and individuals to improve U.S. dietary quality are having some payoff, but it also indicates that these efforts need to be expanded,” study author Dong Wang, a doctoral student in the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), said in a Harvard news release.


“The overall improvement in diet quality is encouraging, but the widening gap related to income and education presents a serious challenge to our society as a whole,” study senior author Walter Willett, chair of the department of nutrition at HSPH, said in the news release.


The new information came from data on more than 29,000 adults — aged 20 to 85 — who took part in the 1999 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The quality of their diets was rated from 0 to 110, with a higher score indicating a healthier diet.


The participants’ average dietary score rose from nearly 40 in 1999 to 2000 to almost 47 in 2009 to 2010. More than half of that improvement was due to people consuming fewer trans fats, according to the HSPH researchers.


Other beneficial changes in Americans’ eating habits included increased consumption of whole fruit, whole grains, nuts, legumes and polyunsaturated fats, and reduced intake of sugar-sweetened beverages.


However, people are not eating more vegetables and haven’t reduced their consumption of red and/or processed meat. Also, their salt intake has increased, a finding the researchers called “disconcerting.”


The study also found that richer people have healthier diets than poorer people, and that this disparity increased between 1999 and 2010. Healthy foods generally cost more and poor people often lack access to stores that sell healthy foods, the researchers noted.


Education also played a role in dietary quality, which was lowest and improved more slowly among people who had 12 years or less of school, according to the study published online Sept. 1 in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.


Mexican Americans had the best dietary quality, while blacks had the lowest. Mexican Americans’ healthier eating habits may be due to dietary traditions or culture, while blacks’ poorer eating habits may be due to lower income and education levels, the researchers said.


The study also found that women tend to have better quality diets than men.


More information


The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about nutrition.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1nQ20V2

Quality of U.S. Diet Improves, Slightly


MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — The quality of Americans’ diets has improved somewhat but remains poor overall, and dietary disparity between the rich and poor is growing, a new study shows.


“The study provides the most direct evidence to date that the extensive efforts by many groups and individuals to improve U.S. dietary quality are having some payoff, but it also indicates that these efforts need to be expanded,” study author Dong Wang, a doctoral student in the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), said in a Harvard news release.


“The overall improvement in diet quality is encouraging, but the widening gap related to income and education presents a serious challenge to our society as a whole,” study senior author Walter Willett, chair of the department of nutrition at HSPH, said in the news release.


The new information came from data on more than 29,000 adults — aged 20 to 85 — who took part in the 1999 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The quality of their diets was rated from 0 to 110, with a higher score indicating a healthier diet.


The participants’ average dietary score rose from nearly 40 in 1999 to 2000 to almost 47 in 2009 to 2010. More than half of that improvement was due to people consuming fewer trans fats, according to the HSPH researchers.


Other beneficial changes in Americans’ eating habits included increased consumption of whole fruit, whole grains, nuts, legumes and polyunsaturated fats, and reduced intake of sugar-sweetened beverages.


However, people are not eating more vegetables and haven’t reduced their consumption of red and/or processed meat. Also, their salt intake has increased, a finding the researchers called “disconcerting.”


The study also found that richer people have healthier diets than poorer people, and that this disparity increased between 1999 and 2010. Healthy foods generally cost more and poor people often lack access to stores that sell healthy foods, the researchers noted.


Education also played a role in dietary quality, which was lowest and improved more slowly among people who had 12 years or less of school, according to the study published online Sept. 1 in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.


Mexican Americans had the best dietary quality, while blacks had the lowest. Mexican Americans’ healthier eating habits may be due to dietary traditions or culture, while blacks’ poorer eating habits may be due to lower income and education levels, the researchers said.


The study also found that women tend to have better quality diets than men.


More information


The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about nutrition.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1nQ20V2

Train Your Brain to Choose Fruit Salad Over French Fries



MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — You may be able to convince your brain that healthy foods taste better than unhealthy ones, new research suggests.


The study included eight overweight and obese people who were enrolled in a newly designed weight-loss program meant to change how people react to different foods. These participants were compared to a control group of five overweight and obese people who weren’t in the program.


Both groups had MRI brain scans at the start of the study and again six months later. The scans revealed that the people in the weight-loss program had changes in areas of the brain reward center involved in learning and addiction.


Specifically, this area showed increased sensitivity to healthy, low-calorie foods and decreased sensitivity to higher-calorie foods, according to the study published online Sept. 1 in the journal Nutrition & Diabetes.


“We don’t start out in life loving French fries and hating, for example, whole wheat pasta,” study senior author Susan Roberts, director of the Energy Metabolism Laboratory at the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, said in a Tufts news release.


“This conditioning happens over time in response to eating — repeatedly — what is out there in the toxic food environment,” explained Roberts, who is also a professor at the School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts and an adjunct professor of psychiatry at the university’s School of Medicine.


And, according to study first author Thilo Deckersbach, “although other studies have shown that surgical procedures like gastric bypass surgery can decrease how much people enjoy food generally, this is not very satisfactory because it takes away food enjoyment generally rather than making healthier foods more appealing.” Deckersbach is a psychologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.


“We show here that it is possible to shift preferences from unhealthy food to healthy food without surgery, and that MRI is an important technique for exploring the brain’s role in food cues,” Deckersbach said in the news release.


Roberts pointed out that “there is much more research to be done here, involving many more participants, long-term follow-up and investigating more areas of the brain. But we are very encouraged that the weight-loss program appears to change what foods are tempting to people.”


More information


The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about healthy eating for a healthy weight.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/W29b55

3 Steps to Perk Up Your Posture

It’s a recipe for rounded shoulders: We sit all day with our heads down, pecking away at keyboards and swiping smartphones. Time to straighten up!


Not only does proper posture strengthen your core and keep your spine in alignment, it can help you stay energized. When you’re hunched forward, you’re in sluggish mode; standing with shoulders back allows you to take deeper, fuller breaths and makes you feel more awake and alert.


RELATED: 14 Reasons You’re Always Tired


To improve your stance, you need to stretch out your shoulders, open up your tight hip flexors and lift your chest. Two of my favorite poses to do just that are Warrior 1 and Triangle with extended arms. Warrior 1 lengthens the front of the thighs, raises the chest and engages the abdominals, while Triangle releases the tightness in the hips and thighs and stretches the waist, shoulders and back muscles, all to support better form.


After doing these moves on both sides, notice how much easier it is to stand with an elongated stature. You may even feel like you grew an inch or two!


RELATED: 10 Ways to Have Great Posture as You Age


1. Stand at the front of your mat with hands on hips. Step back with left foot into a long lunge. Drop outer left heel so toes face forward at a 75-degree angle. Lunge deeper into front knee, lift arms, press palms and look up to hands for Warrior 1. Hold for 5 to 8 breaths.


Alex Beauchesne

Photo: Alex Beauchesne



2. From Warrior 1, straighten right leg as you turn chest to the ceiling. Place right hand on right ankle or shin while you lift left arm directly above you, coming into Triangle pose. Inner right thigh should stay engaged. Hold for 5 breaths.


Alex Beauchesne

Photo: Alex Beauchesne



3. Reach left arm above head toward the front of your mat, palm facing down. Bring right arm under right ear, reaching forward with palm up. Hold for 3 breaths. Lift to stand, and with hands on hips step to the front of your mat. Repeat sequence on other side.


Alex Beauchesne

Photo: Alex Beauchesne



MEET KRISTIN AT WANDERLUST!

Join her for the launch of Wanderlust 108, the first-ever Mindful Triathlon. It takes place on Sept. 13 in Prospect Park in Brooklyn, N.Y., and features a 5K run (Kristin will lead the pre-race stretch), yoga classes and more.








from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/W3sDhB

The New, Needle-Free Allergy Treatment

Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images



As of this year, allergy sufferers have a new needle-free way to find relief: oral immunotherapy pills for ragweed or grass allergies.


The FDA-approved treatments work like shots, exposing you to small amounts of your triggers over time. “The immune system adapts and blocks the out-of-control response that causes symptoms,” says James Sublett, MD, of the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. What to know:


PROS


They’re convenient

Just place a pill under your tongue to dissolve. You’re given the first dose in your allergist’s office but can take the rest at home. (Allergy shots must be administered at your doctor’s office.)


They’re better tolerated than shots

Because the tablets aren’t as strong, they may pose a lower risk of serious reactions like anaphylaxis.


RELATED: Your 12 Worst Allergy Mistakes


CONS


They’re super specific

The pills are for people who have one dominant seasonal allergy to ragweed or certain grasses. Shots can target multiple triggers at once.


They must be taken early

You need to begin the tablets 12 weeks before the start of allergy season. You can start shots four to six weeks before, getting two or three extra doses to build up immunity in less than 12 weeks.


RELATED: 20 Ways to Stop Allergies








from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1qiUoii

Preterm or Small Birth Tied to Long-Term Risks to Heart, Brain


By Dennis Thompson

HealthDay Reporter


MONDAY, Sept. 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) — Babies born early or at low birth weight are at risk later in life of having smaller, less efficient brains or health problems that increase their risk for heart disease, according to a pair of new studies.


But even though these children face potential lifetime disadvantages, researchers in both studies — published online Sept. 1 in Pediatrics — found that these obstacles can be overcome.


Education appeared to negate the potential harmful effects of small birth size on a person’s brain performance, while high blood pressure and high cholesterol can be modified through diet and exercise, the researchers said.


“These two papers both represent a deconstruction of the idea that your future is written in your genes,” said Dr. Edward McCabe, chief medical officer of the March of Dimes. “The things that happen to us in utero [in the womb] or when we should be in utero appear to have an impact on the rest of our lives, but there are steps you can take to modify these outcomes.”


The first study, led by the U.S. National Institute on Aging, used data on over 1,200 babies born in Iceland to track their brain development over 75 years. The research team had access to decades-old midwife records, which enabled them to compare birth weight and size to how the now-senior participants had fared.


Researchers found that babies born at a smaller birth size — an indication of impaired fetal growth during the third trimester — tended to have smaller brains late in life, said senior author Lenore Launer, a senior investigator at the U.S. National Institute on Aging.


Many of those born prematurely tended to think more slowly as older adults and were less able to effectively make plans, stay organized and manage their time, the study authors said.


However, these deficits in brain performance only held true for people who received less education early in their lives, the investigators found. People with more education performed well on brain function tests, even if their brains were physically smaller.


“The key thing is to keep stimulating people educationally, no matter what their level of function appears to be,” McCabe said. “That’s a clear message for us as a society.”


The findings also support the “use it or lose it” theory of dementia, in which people are encouraged to exercise their brains to ward off mental atrophy later in life, Launer said.


“Even though dementia occurs in late age, it’s a lifelong process,” she said. “Modifications during your lifetime could definitely alter your trajectory toward dementia.”


In the second study, researchers in Finland found that 16-year-olds who had been born prematurely have risk factors that could contribute to heart disease later in life.


Specifically, girls born prematurely were two and a half times more likely to have high blood pressure than girls born at term (at 37 weeks or later).


On average, boys that age who had been born preterm had nearly 7 percent higher total cholesterol levels and nearly 12 percent higher levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol than boys born at term, the findings showed.


The study involved over 6,600 teens, about 5 percent of whom had been born preterm.


McCabe said he found it “interesting and important” that premature birth appeared to have different effects on boys and girls.


“You need to measure both, but you really need to focus on the blood pressure in young women and the blood cholesterol in young men,” he said.


But McCabe and the Finnish researchers noted that a healthy lifestyle can help overcome these risk factors, even in kids whose birth circumstances put them at greater risk.


“The modification is exercise,” he said. “We know that exercise improves blood pressure control, and it improves our blood cholesterol levels.”


More information


For more on premature babies, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1piWppI

3 Ways to Burn More Fat With Yoga

Getty Images

Photo: Getty Images



A few simple tweaks to your practice can help you torch bonus calories the next time you step on the mat. Follow these easy tips from top instructor Colleen Saidman Yee, creator of the Gaiam DVD Calorie Killer Yoga.


Sign up for a supercharged class


Look for one that focuses on performing either fast repetitions of sequences such as Sun Salutations, which increases cardiovascular benefits, or slow strengthening exercises, which builds muscle and speeds up your metabolism.


RELATED: How to Do a Perfect Sun Salutation


Push your poses a little harder


You can amplify the strengthening component of any posture in your practice by turning it into even more of an isometric exercise: Try to repeatedly stretch out and then wrinkle the mat with your hands and feet to create push-pull resistance.


Pump it up


Pulsing your arms quickly up and down during both seated and standing yoga poses will really get your heart rate going. Another option is to add light hand and ankle weights to your session, which will make your upper- and lower-body work extra challenging.


RELATED: Yoga Burpee With Dumbbells








from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1nkTGwB

Outdoor Enthusiasts Need a Lightning Plan


SUNDAY, Aug. 31, 2014 (HealthDay News) — Those partaking in outdoor sports and activities need to be aware of the threat posed by lightning and take appropriate safety measures, experts say.


Over the last decade, lightning killed an average of 42 people a year in the United States and caused about 10 times as many injuries. So far this year, there have been 19 reported lightning deaths, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.


In light of the incidents, many of which involved outdoor enthusiasts, the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) has reissued lightning safety guidelines.


“It is critical for those who are in charge of sports and recreational activities, as well as outdoor enthusiasts, to be aware of lightning danger and prepare accordingly,” guidelines committee chair Katie Walsh Flanagan, of East Carolina University, said in a NATA news release.


The guidelines suggest that administrators, coaches, athletic trainers, parents and others involved in outdoor sports and recreational activities create a lightning emergency plan for each venue.


This includes closely monitoring weather forecasts and reports and pinpointing lightning-safe locations, like a building or another fully enclosed space, in advance of events, NATA said, noting unsafe locations include picnic shelters or tables, bus shelters and trees.


Among their other guidelines:



  • Time how long it takes to get to safe locations and plan accordingly.

  • Establish guidelines for suspending and resuming sports or activities. Do not go back outdoors until at least 30 minutes after the last lightning strike or sound of thunder.

  • In large sports venues, have a safety plan for spectators, including a plan for safe and orderly evacuation to previously identified safe locations, and know how long it will take to move them out of the facility.

  • If someone is struck by lightning, move them to a safe location when possible. If an automated external defibrillator is available, use it on victims who don’t have a pulse or are unconscious.


The guidelines are published in NATA’s Journal of Athletic Training.


More information


The U.S. National Weather Service has more about lightning safety.














from Health News / Tips & Trends / Celebrity Health http://ift.tt/1pwAC3T

Disqus معرف

نظام التعليقات

Back to top ↑
Connect with Us

What they says

© 2013 Health and people . WP Mythemeshop Converted by Bloggertheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.